|
The best way to decide whether you should pay points or not is to
perform a break-even analysis. This is done as follows:
- Calculate the cost of the points. Example: 2 points on a $100,000
loan is $2,000.
- Calculate the monthly savings on the loan as a result of obtaining
a lower interest rate. Example: $50 per month
- Divide the cost of the points by the monthly savings to come up
with the number of months to break even. In the above example, this
number is 40 months. If you plan to keep the house for longer than the
break-even number of months, then it makes sense to pay points;
otherwise it does not.
- The above calculation does not take into account the tax advantages
of points. When you are buying a house the points you pay are
tax-deductible, so you realize some savings immediately. On the other
hand, when you get a lower payment, your tax deduction reduces! This
makes it a little difficult to calculate the break-even time taking
taxes into account. In the case of a purchase, taxes definitely reduce
the break-even time. However, in the case of a refinance, the points
are NOT tax-deductible, but have to be amortized over the life of the
loan. This results in few tax benefits or none at all, so there is
little or no effect on the time to break even.
If none of the above makes sense, use this simple rule of thumb: If
you plan to stay in the house for less than 3 years, do not pay points.
If you plan to stay in the house for more than 5 years, pay 1 to 2
points. If you plan to stay in the house for between 3 and 5 years, it
does not make a significant difference whether you pay points or not!
Zero-Point/Zero-Fee Loans
Whatever happened to the conventional wisdom of waiting for the rates
to drop 2% before refinancing?
You have a 30-year fixed loan at 8.5%. A loan officer calls you up and
says they can refinance you to a rate of 8.0% with no points and no fees
whatsoever.
What a dream come true! No appraisal fees, no title fees and not even
any junk fees! Is this a deal too good to pass up? How can a bank and
broker do this? Doesn't someone have to pay? Whose money is being used
to pay these closing costs?
No––this is not a scam. Thousands of homeowners have
refinanced using a zero-point/zero-fee loan. Some refinanced multiple
times, riding rates all the way down the curve in 1992, 1993 and, more
recently, in 1996. Some homeowners used zero-point/zero-fee adjustable
loans to refinance and get a new teaser rate every year.
The way this works is based on rebate pricing, sometimes also known as
yield-spread pricing, and sometimes known as a service-release premium.
The basic idea is that you pay a higher rate in exchange for cash up
front, which is then used to pay the closing costs. You will pay a
higher monthly payment––so the money is really coming from
future payments that you will make.
You can also think of this as negative points! For example, a 30-year
fixed loan may be available at a retail price of :
8.0% with 2 points or
8.25% with 1 point or
8.5% with 0 points or
8.75% with -1 point or
9% with -2 points
On a $200,000 loan, the loan officer can offer you 8.75% with a cost
of -1 point, which is a $2,000 credit towards your closing costs. A
mortgage broker can use rebate pricing to pay for your closing costs and
keep the balance of the rebate as profit.
What are the benefits of a zero-point/zero-fee loan?
The main benefit is that you have no out-of-pocket costs. As a result,
if the rates drop in the future, you could refinance again even for a
small drop in rates. So if you refinanced on the zero-point/zero-fee
loan to get a rate of 8.75% and if the rates drop 1/2%, you can
refinance again to 8.25%. On the other hand, if you refinanced by paying
1 point and got a rate of 8.25%, it may not make sense to refinance
again. Now, if the rates drop another 1/2%, a zero-point/zero-fee loan
can drop your rate to 7.75%, whereas if you paid points, you may have to
do a break-even analysis to decide if refinancing will save you money.
The zero-point/zero-fee loan eliminates the need to do a break-even
analysis since there is no up-front expense that needs to be recovered.
It also is a great way to take advantage of falling rates.
Some consumers have used zero-point/zero-fee loans on adjustable loans
to refinance their adjustables every year and pay a very low teaser
rate.
What are the disadvantages of a zero-point/zero-fee loan?
The main disadvantage is that you are paying a higher rate than you
would be paying if you had paid points and closing costs. If you keep
the loan for long enough, you will pay more––since you have
higher mortgage payments. In the scenario where you plan to stay in the
house for more than 5 years, and if rates never drop for you to
refinance, you could wind up paying more money. If, on the other hand,
you plan to stay at a property for just 2-3 years, there really is no
disadvantage of a zero-point/zero-fee loan.
Whose money is it?
Since you are being paid "cash" up-front in exchange for a
higher rate, it really is your own money that will be paid in the future
through higher payments. Investors who fund these loans hope that you
will keep the loans for long enough to recoup their up-front investment.
If you refinance the loans early, both the servicer and the investor
could lose money.
To summarize, zero-point/zero-fee loans in many cases are good deals.
Make sure, however, that the lender pays for your closing costs from
rebate points and NOT by increasing your loan amount. So if your old
loan amount was $150,000, your new loan amount should also be $150,000.
You may have to come up with some money at closing for recurring costs
(taxes, insurance, and interest), but you would have to pay for these
whether you refinanced or not.
Zero-point/zero-fee loans are especially attractive when rates are
declining or when you plan to sell your house in less than 2-3 years.
Zero-point/zero-fee loans may not be around forever. Lenders have
discussed adding a pre-payment penalty to such loans, however few
lenders have taken steps to implement such a measure.
|